> > > > >

Catholic and Enjoying It!

Mark Shea's Blog: So That No Thought of Mine, No Matter How Stupid, Should Ever Go Unpublished Again!


Tips are deeply appreciated! Yes! I do take Credit Cards!

Atom RSS Feed







Gifts from Aquinas and More



CatholicDestination2




Franciscan Friars of the Assumption Province - Religious Vocations for Men


Netflix, Inc.



Little Way Web Store

Hard to find holy cards and photographs of St. Therese imported directly from her store in Lisieux. We specialize in carmelite spirituality and offer a wide selection of books and gifts about carmelite spirituality. This is the website you have been waiting for.


Gethsemane Garden Stones

Stations of the Cross Garden Stepping Stones transform your garden into a Prayer Garden



Check Out "Rock Solid"

Mark Shea's Podcast














Ignatius Press - Catholic Books



























My Site (Mark-Shea.com)
Act One: Writing for Hollywood
AirMaria
American Chesterton Society
Ave Maria Singles
Catherine of Siena Institute
Catholic Educator's Resource Center
Catholic Exchange
Crossroads Initiative
Decent Films
Drudge Report
Exceptional Marriages
Gilbert Magazine
MercatorNet
Peter Kreeft
Mars Hill Review
St. Austin Review
St. Blog's Prayer Network
Star of the Sea: Catholic Resources from Paul Thigpen
<< # St. Blog's Parish ? >>
Jimmy Akin: Defensor Fidei
David Alexander's Man with Black Hat: Zydeco Catholic
Mike Aquilina's Fathers of the Church
Rod Bennett: Tremendous Trifles
Domenico Bettinelli: Very Sensible Guy
Nancy Brown: Flying Stars
Elliot Bougis: Fides, Cogitatio, Actio
Chris Burgwald's Veritas
Cacciaguida: Defending the 12th Century Since the 14th
Catholic World News - Off the Record
Cosmos Liturgy Sex: That About Covers it All
Disputations: Dedicated to Arguing
Ross Douthat: The Atlantic's Most Sensible Writer
Michael Dubruiel's Annunciations: Sanity in Cyberspace
Envoy's Blog: A Banana Republic for Catholic Apologists
Dawn Eden: The Dawn Patrol
Get Religion: The Smartest Blog on the Web about Religion and Media
Dave Hartline: The Catholic Report
Heart, Mind and Strength: The Weblog of Exceptional Marriages and Other Fun Stuff
Intentional Disciples: The Group Blog of the St. Catherine of Siena Institute
Fr. Rob Johansen: Thrownback
Christopher Johnson: Midwest Conservative Journal
Daniel Larison: Eunomia
Fr. Dwight Longenecker: Standing on My Head
White Around the Collar
Mary's Aggies: Aggies for Mary
Mere Comments: Touchstone's blog
Mommentary: Elinor Dashwood's Sensible Blog
Barbara Nicolosi's Church of the Masses
On the Square: The First Things Blog
James Preece: Catholic and Loving it! (Not to be confused with another site of a similar name)
Dale Price: Dyspeptic Mutterings
Scott P. Richert is All About Catholicism
Scrappleface: As Funny as the Onion
The Shrine of the Holy Whapping: Fun Lovin' Catholic Nerds from Notre Dame
Southern Appeal: The Law with 11 Catholic Herbs and Spices
Andrew Sullivan: The 800 Pound Gorilla of the Blogosphere Who is Hopelessly Fuddled about Catholicism and Sex
Mark Sullivan: Irish Elk
Amy Welborn's Charlotte Was Both
What's Wrong with the World: Sane People in Insane Times
Eve Tushnet: Wide Ranging Mind
Daniel Vitz: Committed to an Institute
Vox Nova Blog: An Interest Catholic Group Blog
Zippy Catholic: Committed to Catholic Common Sense
etc


Wednesday, November 26, 2003

Okay. Now I'm outta here.

Have a splendid Thanksgiving!




An assignment for my readers (since I gotta get to work)

Help this guy!
I am the Cubmaster for my son's Cub Scout Pack. We are gathering the boys this Saturday at the Naval base movie theater to watch a movie this Saturday. The theater permits private parties to rent the facility for $25, choose from their vast movie archives, and eat all the theater junk food they care to pay for (the renters are free to provide their own food and not pay for any theater food, too). We're making the "admission price" one gift for the Toys for Tots program, and are having a couple of Marines come in the collect the toys from the boys in their dress uniforms and combat fatigues.

Anyhow, I'm looking for a suitable Christmas movie to show. I initially proposed "A Christmas Story," the one with Ralphie and his efforts at obtaining a Red Rider BB Gun. I watched it this past weekend, however, and had forgotten that it's got a fair amount of mild profanity in it, e.g., "you betchyurass," "sonuvabitch," and bastard -- and not just from Darren McGavin's "The Old Man". I'm now a bit reluctant to show it to the boys, the youngest being only six-years old.

I've asked for suggestions from the den leaders, but the best they've come up with is Jim Carrey's Grinch movie. Er, thanks, but no. I pointed out some of your criticisms to one of the parents and his response was, "I don't read reviews. I mean, what does Hollywood know except porn and related stuff these days?" This, from a very smart and successful businessman.

So-o-o-o, how about you, Mr. Mark P. Shea's Visual Media-guy? Any good recommendations that the boys will most likely enjoy, and perhaps even the parents, too?

As an aside on a completely different subject, a fella from the office is wearing his Mason belt buckle today. Another worker asked him about it, and he immediately started trumpeting the Catholic Church's objections to the group, pooh-poohing it as mere sour grapes. That is, he claims that the Popes were all members up until 1752 when the Masons decided to let non-Catholics in, thus taking away the Church's control over the group. Sounds like a bunch of hooey to me, but I'm at a loss as to where I can go or info to refute his historical claims. I believe the Catechism has some verbiage on the prohibition for its members, but I don't think it gets into the history of the group and/or the Church's relationship to the group. Can you give me a steer as to where I can educate myself?

Very briefly:
Movie: Why not an old classic like "Fantastic Voyage" or "The Seventh Voyage of Sinbad"? Anybody else got any ideas?

Office mate's claims: Your response should be, "Documentation please?"

Your resource for stuff on Masonry: New Advent or Catholic Answers.



Christmas vs. Advent

A reader asks:
One thing I would love to see discussed on your Blog is whether I'm the only one out there who battles not only cultural Catholics, but even orthodox Catholics about the true meaning of Advent and the true meaning of Christmas and the fact that they are NOT the same! I refuse to play Christmas carols until Christmas Eve. In my neighborhood, Christmas trees are out for trash pickup on December 26th! I continue playing carols until the Christmas season is over. Am I all alone in this?

I'm not a stickler about Christmas carols, but I try to keep Advent in a Adventish spirit, which is typically pretty fun at Chez Shea since I don't necessarily think penance and preparation for the birth are the opposite of fun. And I'm a big one for celebrating the Twelve Days.



More people in need of Insensitivity Training

And another thing! How come we call jacks "male" and "female"? Why don't we call them "jacks" and "jills"? And what about the rape imagery inherent in the term "plug n' play"? O the humanity!

The more comfortable a culture becomes, the more it is has to concoct imaginary struggles in order to compensate for the fact that it has no real ones.



Basically, Steve's right, of course.

However, remember that the Church's moral theology specifies three things necessary for grave sin: grave matter, sufficient knowledge, and freedom. Merely supporting abortion does not necessarily put you out of the Church, because you may do so because you are an uneducated idiot, or because something in your background might be so traumatizing ("I watched my mother be raped by the KGB. She aborted that baby. Are you telling me she's in hell?") that a person doesn't have the interior freedom to consider the Church's teaching clearly. In our culture, I think there's a huge amount of ignorance and also a great lack of freedom (think of every young girl ever pressured by boyfriends and parents to abort). So while support for abortion is certainly contrary to Catholic teaching, there are probably lots of cases where Catholics are, at best, material heretics, not formal ones.

This, among other things, is why we are commanded not to judge. Non-Catholic *ideas* should be rejected with great force. The people who hold them should be presumed Catholic if they call themselves Catholic. It's the bishop's task to excommunicate, not ours.

"Never attribute to malice what can be sufficiently explained by stupidity." - Mark Twain



Unleash the Power of the Blog!

Encourage bishops as they begin to do the right thing about pro-abort politicians

Contact information of members of the USCCB new task force that will address (?) pro-abort Catholics.

= = =

1) Most Rev. John H. Ricard, SSJ, DD, PhD
Diocese of Pensacola-Tallahassee, FL
PO Drawer 17329
Pensacola, FL 32522
Phone: 850-432-1515
Fax: 850-436-6424
Web: www.ptdiocese.org
Email: chancellor@ptdiocese.org

2) His Eminence Theodore Cardinal McCarrick, PhD, DD
Diocese of Washington, DC
5001 Eastern Ave.
PO Box 29260
Washington, DC 20017-0260
Phone: 301-853-4500
Fax: 301-853-5346
Email: chancery@adw.org

3) Most Rev. Joseph A. Galante, DD, JCD
Diocese of Dallas, TX
3725 Blackburn
PO Box 190507
Dallas, TX 75219
Phone: 214-528-2240
Fax: 214-526-1743
Web: www.cathdal.org
Email: ccfcdal@cathdal.org

4) Most Rev. Thomas Wenski
Diocese of Orlando, FL
PO Box 1800
Orlando, FL 32802
Phone: 407-246-4800
Fax: 407-246-4942
Web: www.orlandodiocese.org

5) Most Rev. Donald W. Trautman, STD, SSL
Diocese of Erie, PA
St. Mark Catholic Center
PO Box 10397
Erie, PA 16514
Phone: 814-824-1111
Fax: 814-824-1128
Web: www.eriecd.org

6) Most Rev. Bernard J. Harrington, DD
Diocese of Wiona, MN
55 W. Sanborn St.
PO Box 588
Winona, MN 55987
Phone: 507-454-4643
Fax: 507-454-8106
Web: www.dow.org
Email: diocese@dow.org






Obviously John Gibson has not seen "American Beauty"

Any red-blooded American male must meet middle age by imploding in selfish Baby Boomer narcissism and an orgy of adolescent self-destruction. Domestic happiness is so bourgeois. Doesn't he realize the point of life is to have as many failed marriages as the average New York Times writer or Hollywood suit? Gibson probably doesn't even know any repressed psycho military types or utterly stable gay couples who are the model of joy and life. What a sheltered life!





The Left Demonstrates Shea's Law

Sin makes you stupid. In this case, really really stupid.

Normal people begin to look on the Left with horror, even as it look on itself with swelling pride.



The Media Blitz Continues

Current estimates place the gay population in the United States at over 200 million. That's why the media talk about nothing else.



In Kristof's world, it's "reactionary"...

to say the body is made for committed monogamous love and committed monogamous love is made for the body.

to say that the best way to avoid AIDS is to avoid promiscuous sex.

to say that no epidemiologist in his or her five wits would *ever* engage in "safe" sex with an HIV+ partner, unless he or she had a death wish.

to say that Russian Roulette tends to kill people.

The New York Times: arbiter of cultural wisdom for people who only have time to read the newspapers.



A Statue Catholics Won't Pray to...

...though, God willing, we will pray about.

Never Again!



My Latest at Catholic Exchange

I give you thanks, O Lord!


Tuesday, November 25, 2003


Theory

and

Practice



Maybe the Stupid Party isn't so Stupid

One enterprising blogger has put up what looks to me like a spoof of the most over-the-top idiot leftist blog you could imagine: BlameBush. It's almost credible as an effusion of leftist hysteria, full of all the normal "conservatives are nazis/destroy Rush Limbaugh blah blah--until it starts blaming Bush for solar flares. Then you start sensing that you've been had. A fun read if you enjoy parodies of looney leftist rhetoric. However, the problem is that it often so hard to tell these days since lefties are frequently parodies of themselves.

To whoever writing it: please fulfill a dream of mine and write a hysterical screed indicting Bush for doing nothing to stop continental drift.



Hey! Listen up!



A reader writes:
I spent my childhood on the receiving end of very serious physical, emotional, and, yes, sexual abuse. I often puzzle over the mystery of why some of us who have lived through this are able to experience considerable (never total - our hope is resurrection, not returning to some kind of pre-abuse innocence)healing and that our nightmare childhoods no longer dominate our life. It is rather like a fading memory that wakes when I confront events like this.

When it does wake up, what is most apparent is how relatively little power those wounds have over my life today. I sometimes try to imagine who I would be if it had never happened but quickly realize that is simply romantic day-dreaming.

Who I am today is a result of the years of struggle to find God's grace, healing and forgiveness and the extraordinary help I received from some remarkable people. I remain intensely grateful to God for this grace. I will *never* take my ability to function as an adult at a high level for granted - it is too hard won.

I often get discouraged when I compare my lack of zeal and devotion to those of the saints but one particular teaching of our Lord I can speak of with total confidence: the transforming power of forgiveness.

Without forgiving my enemy, mere healing would never have set me free. It took about 10 years :-} but when it was done, it was done! When I forgave and actually could bring myself to bless my enemy, I ceased to be a victim. I was not longer bound by what was done to me and I began to grow like a weed.

C.S. Lewis pointed out something in his forward to the Great Divorce that I have found very true: redemption works backwards. Opening ourselves to God's grace in the present can eventually encompass our terrible pasts and even the ones who made our lives a living hell.

You know what the real opposite of being a victim is? It's being free and whole enough to wholly desire and work for the healing and redemption of one's enemy. It is beyond our imagining when on the journey but if we journey with Christ, it is the place for which we are bound.



And now, I'm outta here

Back to work, Shea! Crack!



"My Kingdom is not of this world"

This passage has been much on my mind since Mass this weekend (it was the gospel reading, for you non-liturgical folk). One of the hazards of spending too much time reading the news and following the day by day power struggles in the Church and the world is that you can start believing the lie that the power struggles are Where It's At.

That is a lie.

Ask most people where the headquarters of the Church is and they will tell you "Rome". That's false too. The headquarters of the Church is Heaven, because the Church, in the Ascended Christ, is already there, far above all dominion, authority and power. Mark that, Christ *is* the Church. He is the soul of the Church by his Holy Spirit. Because he is fully human, humanity has *already* ascended to heaven. That is why Paul can tell us in Ephesians that we are seated with him in the heavenlies.

Are. Not "will be". One consequence of this fact is that the Church exists before it has any members. We get to participate in the Church by grace, we don't tag along after the Resurrection and "start" the Church in "response" to Jesus as a sort of "Resurrection Memorial Society". Jesus, the head of the Church, starts the Church and then graciously adds us to it. That means that the new covenant, unlike all previous covenants between man and God (in Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and David) is incapable of failure because the man making the covenant is not fallen but is the Incarnate God himself, who cannot sin. The failures of the Church's members can be forgiven and the Church can remain spotless precisely because the Church is not its members, but is Christ. It depends on the Head for its life, not on us. And the Head is not *going* to Heaven. He's already there. So the victory of the Church is not so much assured as it is already accomplished.

For this reason, Paul tells us sagely to set our minds on heavenly things, not on earthly things. If we allow *any* earthly thing to cause us to despair, it is a certain sign that we have taken our eyes off the heavenly truth of Christ ascended that we should be contemplating. And the remedy for that is to put our eyes back on that Truth and to remind ourselves of the fact that he is the Truth. The sliminess of bishops, the sins of priests, the machinations of politicians, the meanness of men, our own pathetic sinfulness: these are not the Ultimate Reality. Christ crucified, risen and ascended is.

And he is still able to save. His kingdom is not of this world. It is more, not less, real than that. Don't lose sight of that.



Neumayr on Brooks

Some people resist the Stupid Party's Dalliance with becoming Evil Party 2.0.



Am I the only one who wonders...

how this guy, having endured what he endured, could then decide to spend several years defending the diocese and opposing other victims? Something about this guy doesn't add up to me. But then, I'm not an abuse victim and don't know the strains and cross currents it puts on the psyche.

It is frustrating to see his diocese admit he's a victim (at least, it looks that way to me) and then say, "Sorry Charlie. Statute of limitations is past." In the words of Kathy Shaidle, "Someday they'll all be dead."

In the meantime, I keep in mind the very hopeful assessment my friend Sherry Weddell of the Siena Institute gives of the priests who are in the pipeline right now but will not be seeing episcopal ordination for a few years. She's seen a *lot* of the Church in the US and is very optimistic that serious reform will come. And I trust her judgment.

So hope remains, even in the American Church's "November".




The Vanishing Case for War

At least, for the war in Iraq (though that's water under the bridge now).



Interesting piece on the Kennedy Funeral

One of the blessings of belonging to a cold dead stiff formal Church of rote prayers and rituals is that when times of trauma strike, you don't have to extemporaneously compose prayers and whomp up an entire psycho-emotional coping mechanism ex nihilo. The rites and prayers already exist and you can step into them. They hold you erect when everything has gone numb.

My mother-in-law, God bless her, has forgotten her own children. But she still knows how to pray to her Father in heaven because the Our Father is written on her heart. Likewise, the Hail Mary and the Glory Be. There's something to be said for "dead" religion. It seems to outlast what many take for living religion and which often turns out to be a mere effusion of feelings, as ephemeral as the flowers.


Monday, November 24, 2003


I just want to affirm Mark of Minute Particulars in his wrongness

I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.



It wasn't me!

Even though Barb's dead wrong about the LOTR films, I think the world of her. I am, however, praying for fervently both for her and Amy.



It's finally happened...

My computer is officially Old. When I got this thing (back in October 1998, when Pangaea was breaking up), it was top o' the line. 450 Mhz processor. A total rocket.

Since then, of course, I've been aware of the decay of age and the rapid succession of younger spritelier upstart systems. But my good old Pentium has remained serviceablea and still done everything I needed it to. I even felt competent when I installed a CD burner.

But now, the latest edition in the Myst saga--Uru--is out. It requires an 800 Mhz processor! O the humanity!

I am Burgess Meredith, the Obsolete Man!



Gay Brownshirts on the March!
WE'VE been hacked! Little old CaNN! The site was apparently renamed-- blush-- [F***you.com]. The honours and accolades just keep piling up. First the DDOS-attack, and now this! They love us-- they really love us! Our Tech Dep't has things under control. Word to the Cowardly Custards-- what are you afraid of? Rest of the story might get out? Then you'll just have to hack every single like-minded website planetwide, because the story keeps getting out, and more websites keep springing up, and new Blogs and e-mail lists keep passing things on. Blow us up, and ten more would come to replace us. God bless you, then-- and yes, we forgive you! ...(FYI)

A point of clarification for the hypersensitive. Contrary to agitprop, I do not call all gays "brownshirts". I call gay brownshirts "brownshirts". One achieves brownshirthood not by being gay, but by engaging in brownshirt tactics such as the one mentioned above, or by otherwise muzzling or attempting to stifle free speech, or by threatening or inflicting physical violence or other forms of intimidation (including judicial intimidation). Sooner or later, even the hypersensitive will perhaps figure out this elementary point.




Just another reason to love my hometown!

My heart swells with regional pride!



Another satisfied Cat in the Hat viewer

A reader writes:
I made the mistake of taking Clarissa and Emma (and my dear mother-in-law) to the Cat in the Hat movie this past weekend. I presumed that since the book is for 3-8 year olds that the movie would be perfect for the girls who are 5 and 3 but I was very sadly mistaken.

Nothing in this movie apart from the characters (the cat, Conrad and Sally, the fish, their mother, thing 1 and thing 2) and the theme of messing up a house has ANYTHING to do with the wonderful book by Dr. Seuss. The movie is an affront to Asian women and is laden with sexual innuendoes and cut off expletives. Unfortunately, I was remiss in researching the rating of this movie (which turns out to be PG) because I was silly enough to think that a movie based on a book for 3-8 year olds would not have sexual jokes and expletives..mea culpa.but it will never happen again.

Universal Pictures and the Estate of Dr. Seuss should be ashamed of allowing such a travesty of a beloved children's book to be produced. Please do not add to the profits of this movie (as I did) and discourage all your friends (who you think might take their children to it) from going.

Here are just some of the many things that happen in the movie:

In the first scene in which he appears, the cat in the hat (Mike Myers) leers at a picture of the mother (Kelly Preston) that is in a frame.as he picks up the frame the picture drops out like a centrefold picture and the cat groans "who is this?".to which Conrad and Sally reply "our mother"..the cat then looks to the audience and jokes "talk about awkward moment"

Conrad and Sally's baby-sitter is a large Asian woman who promptly falls asleep as soon as the mother closes the door to leave. Throughout the entire movie this woman is asleep and her body is mocked in every possible way - from the cat who sits on the couch where she is lying and bounces up and down on her and complains how lumpy the couch is; in another clip her large body is apparently the only thing they can find in the ENTIRE house that is suitable to weigh down the lid of the magic box that the cat needs to keep closed; the most disgraceful point of the movie happens when the children and the cat enter the cat in the hat's world and need something to ride on and (you guessed it) they sit on this sleeping woman's body and take what looks like a water slide ride out of a theme park. [at this point I noticed an Asian lady and her 7 year old daughter walk out of the cinema.which I would have done myself but we were in a middle section and I was with my 3 and 5 year old daughters and my Portuguese mother-in-law and I had no idea how to communicate to my dear mother-in-law that I wanted to leave. I also did not want to punish my young daughters because luckily for me the sexual innuendoes were well above their heads. But I will do all I can now to prevent this from happening to other families.]

Acronym for cat in the hat's car is SH**

Alec Baldwin says "what the F***", "son of a B****"

Cat says that really burns my a**

One of cat's options for dealing with the annoying neighbour (Alec Baldwin) is murder.

One scene that was not over the heads of my daughters unfortunately was when the cat in the hat, in an attempt to go undetected at a children's birthday party, pretends to be the piñata. Of course the scene that follows is a bunch of children beating the cat with baseball bats while he screams (the children in the movie cannot hear his screams but mine cringed at them). Finally when the children at the party realize they cannot 'break' the cat in the hat, the children step aside and a large boy with a huge bat takes a really nice whack at the cat who screams in pain.

I hope I can prevent others from making the huge mistake I did.

Toldja it was loathsome.

Okay. Now I'm really gone.



And now, back to work Shea!



From the "Don't Stand So Close to Me" Dept.

The creature who drew this:



gives a big wet sloppy Kiss of Endorsement to Howard Dean. To the amazement of all, Dean does not scream for Security and beg aides to bring him a disinfectant. Instead, he seems to be happy with the endorsement as are many of his loopy supporters.

One more illustration of how utterly clueless the Left is. Bush is going to win in a walk.



Brilliant!

I don't know who Marianne Thompson of Fuller Theological Seminary is, but I'd love to shake her hand.

(Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader).



A reader asks:
Mark, this article really hit the nail on the head in regards to the persecution of Christians that I fear is coming. I realize that we are already being persecuted, but I fear the time is coming when this persecution will be much more direct for those of us who will strive to remain faithful. Maybe even concentration camps.

I'm wondering what your thoughts are on this subject?

My thoughts: "“Therefore do not be anxious about tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Let the day’s own trouble be sufficient for the day." - Matthew 6:34

Not very original, but still quite serviceable.



Another whiner complains about Rome's "authoritarian violence"

The guy fails to explain how he can get articles like this published if Rome is so all-fired authoritarian and violent.
"But do they dare to talk about you like that?" said Lucy. "They seemed to be so afraid of you yesterday. Don't they know you might be listening?"

"That's one of the funny things about the Duffers," said the Magician. "One minute they talk as if I ran everything and overheard everything and was extremely dangerous. The next moment they think they can take me in by tricks that a baby would see through - bless them!" - C.S. Lewis, The Voyage of the Dawn Treader




SAFE FROM HARM

Suppose that in the sacristy the devil puts on priestly robes
So what? The devil too believes in God, but hates Him
(The missionary atheist is worse than hell that holds him
Therefor condemnation and the millstone)
If Satan abhors God still the flesh and blood appear
Though the devil may consume it to destroy

Intending to destroy - but God is indestructible -
Everything veers toward Him, even hell is drawn
Puts on the robe, holds the chalice and the paten
Says the consecrating words intending to defile
Plugs the universe inside the swollen belly
But not God - only fire falls there, burning block

Robes hang on the hook, the meal of consecration
Flesh and blood before the Fall when all was sacred
Now in noble yet debased, debasing form lies there
Innocent material indifference lets the garments down in folds
Toward the passive ground, toward the center of the world
In wordless bland repose, things, vessels, means of work

But even there the flexing energy of God
And what is done has come to mind from ages old,
Blessing, blessing purifying what was godless and defiled
With holy grace, twice blessed: creation, sacrifice
So that the bread can speak and wine can sing in hymns
And those who can consume do both, they are anointed

Safe from harm

- Pavel Chichikov




David versus Goliath



Consumerist Americans Hope to Consume their Young for the Crime of being the Wrong Sex

Fortunately, God is on the side of the West, so we don't have to expect any big judgments for things like this.






Media
unleashes
Pro
Gay
Marriage
Campaign

I particularly like the article that compares the Gay Marriage Onslaught to the Underground Railroad that rescued slaves and sent them to Canada. Nothing like ham-fisted agitprop for a Monday morning.




Another attempt to attack the Church via judicial fiat

This boils down to an attempt to say that adherence to the Church's moral teaching is punishable by US law. Like most attempts my liberalism to destroy the Church or ordinary human morality, it is not being pursued by democratic means, but by judicial tyranny.



Episcopal Spine Alert!



A reader asks:
I have been wondering a little about this today and I was wondering if you had the answer. Is it a bad thing that natives on some Pacific Islands don't wear much or any clothes? Now I know that it is not for "sexy" reasons that they do it. They live in an entirely different world than we live in. But once they become Catholics, should they be required to were more clothes? And if so, why? Our first parents didn't wear clothes in the Garden of Eden before they sinned, therefore nudity can't be intrinsicly evil. But we live after the Fall. What conclusion can be drawn from that with regard to indigenous peoples?

I think one of the more dangerous pieces of mischief to infect Christian missionary efforts has been the temptation to equate "Christian" with "European" or "American". The ridiculous attempt to impose starched collars on "the natives" in the Congo a hundred years ago was, I think, simply wrong and I think similar attempts today in some tropical climate are simply wrong as well. Revelation calls us to be "modest". It does not prescribe any micromanaging theory of clothing for that. All such things must be measured according to the culture. In Victorian England, the sight of an ankle was immodest. A few centuries earlier, a busty serving wench in a low cut dress was not immodest. Similarly, the practically naked bush people of the Kalihari have standards of modesty, but they are not Euro standards. It is important that these standards of modesty be respected and affirmed. But it is not important that they start wearing levis just so some American or European Christian with a confusion between his faith and his culture will feel that they are doing their Christianity the "right" way.

IMO, of course.





Go Jeb!

The man continues to impress me.



Here's a hopeful sign:

The Boston Catholic Philosophical Forum
The BCPF is an emerging platform of discussion tangent to issues both philosophic and theological relative to the Roman Catholic Church. It is a tribunal of reason, as well as common sense, before which latent elements in current issues concerning the laity and Religious alike are openly and critically examined through the canons of reason and in light of the authentic Magisterium of the Church.

The Forum is in full accord with, and is totally committed to, the Magisterium of the Church.



A polite request which will be followed by swift action if not heeded

Please refrain from all "The Jews are tunnelling under the foundations of our culture!" suggestions on my blog. If you wish to discuss apostate Jews or secular liberals (that is, Jews who are as Jewish as Madonna is Catholic), you should just forget the category "Jewish" altogether (as I forget the category "Catholic" altogether in discussing Madonna's baleful effect on our culture). But to suggest that the mere ethnicity of some religion-hating Hollywood type is germane to the discussion is to invite kooks and anti-semites on to my blog and I will not have it.

Serious Jews such as Michael Medved and Rabbi Daniel Lapin will be the first to acknowledge that for a great many American Jews, the real religion is liberalism (as it is for a great many American Catholics), and that such folk are as hostile to serious Judaism as they are to Christianity. Since that is so, please do not clutter up the discussion by referring to such acolytes of secularism as "the Jews" since they are, in no real or living sense, Jews but merely devotees of the same ruinous secular messianic and hedonistic project that occupies so many liberal Protestants and Catholics as well. For every Weinstein, there's a Scorcese and a Dan Brown as well.



A reader asks:
There has been a lot of discussion recently on your blog about the Jesuits. . . what do people think of Loyola University in Chicago? Is it somewhere where an orthodox, devout Catholic could feel comfortable?

Dunno any specifics, but my "wise as serpents" instinct is to be wary of any Jesuit institution. Anybody know anything about Loyola?



A reader asks:
We all know it's not an overwhelmingly popular choice for married people to abstain from sex before marriage and not to cohabitate, although it has been the norm in Western Civilization for most of history. But it still happens, probably more commonly that we'd know watching prime time TV. Even among those who don't succeed at one or both of those things, many recognize it as a goal, and ideal they SHOULD live up to.

I wonder if that's true for gay partners who wish to marry. If gay marriage is legalized, will a substantial percentage of gay couples abstain from sex and cohabitation before marriage? Will any? I truly wonder if abstinence is even a part of gay dating the way it is for so many heterosexual daters.

I honestly don't know the answers to those questions, but if gay marriage is unthinkable without sexual activity and/or cohabitation first, it would suggest a radically different view of the role of sex in a relationship. For traditional marriage, sex is an important, even necessary or defining component of the marriage covenant. But given that most heterosexual married people through history in Western Civilization have married never knowing whether the sex will be good, bad or indifferent, never even knowing if the other person puts the cap on the toothpaste or not, it seems there are other elements of marriage that are even more important than sex. I am honestly curious whether that's the case with gay partners who desire marriage.

I highly doubt gays want to marry in order to abstain from sex in preparation. Even most straights don't bother with that formality. I think the push has much more to do with economic benefits (a small issue) and (the main issue), the insistence that fallen human nature has on trying to dominate. The demand at the back of this is not for "tolerance" (which gays already have). It is for approval and for the stamping out of any voice that says, "I think homosexual behavior is sinful and contrary to nature." In short, it is part of a larger cultural campaign (captained, as we are assured by Ephesians 6:12) to stamp out the voice of the Holy Spirit. The simple fact is that the flesh and the spirit are as much at war now as they were when Paul said they were at war in Galatians. We are assured of the final victory, but there can be real setbacks along the way. We are in the midst of one now.



Saturday, November 22, 2003

And now, as is my new mantra, back to work!



Today is also the Feast Day of St. Jack Lewis

As a Catholic, I often invoke his intercession when I write. I hope to meet him someday, but I fear that, if I make it to heaven at all, I shall be too far up in the nosebleeds and he too close to the Throne for us to ever shake hands through the press of angel, archangels, virgins, martyrs and all the company of heaven. But if we do, I intend to thank him for all that his work has meant to me. Problem is, there will be several million people ahead of me in line! No wonder God's given us eternal life. It'll take that long just to give adequate thanks to all the creatures whom he used to bring us to Him.

May all who have died on this day find the happiness of heaven through the intercession of St. Cecilia, whose feast day this is. We ask this through Christ our Lord. Amen.



Question for people over 45

Where were you at this moment 40 years ago? I was with my mom at the commissary at Paine Field AFB near Everett, Washington. Mom bustled home to watch the news after the radio in the back room said the president had been shot. Being five, I did not much notice the news of the assassination. What I remember was the pervasive gloom of the weekend (odd how children can have "feeling memories" that are more pungent than "event memories") and I remember being very angry the next day that all the cartoons were cancelled and it was nothing but news, news, news. Like I say, I was five.

You?



Mending Fences

Longtime readers of my blog will know that there has been bad blood in the past between myself and Joe D'Hippolito both here and on other blogs. However, to his great credit, after a recent flareup of hostilities on another blog, Joe mustered the moxie to say "I was wrong" and to apologize. This seemed like a good opportunity to try to do some reconciliation on my part as well.

So let me take this space to say "I was wrong" as well for needlessly fighting with Joe, for attacking him personally, and particularly for cluttering up other people's blogs with that animosity. As we both agree, we have certain disagreements about both ecclesial and political matters which are simply irreconcilable. However, it was wrong of me to allow those disagreements to descend into a personal feud. So I ask his forgiveness (and the forgiveness of the various innocent bystanders in the blogosphere who have had to put up with it) and I extend my forgiveness to him for whatever wrongs he has done me.

I hope we can move on from here as better disciples of Christ.


Friday, November 21, 2003

I knew it! I knew it! I knew it!

The same cretins who decided to destroy The Grinch(TM) Who Stole Christmas have gotten their stupid filthy mitts on the Cat in the Hat(TM) and turned it into a bloody bloated montrosity pointlessly sprinkled with adolescent sex jokes. I hated the Grinch with all the passion my soul could muster. An outrageous defacement of childhood goofiness by soulless Hollywood suits. Now they've compounded the crime.

The Seuss Estate should figure out a way to get out of their contract with these grubby little slimes who care nothing for childish whimsy and who only know how to laugh at their own coarse high schools sophomore gags.



The Great Enema Continues

Okay. Now I'm really gone.



And now, back to work

Argue amongst yourselves about gay rights, Israeli Walls, toxic Palestinian culture (also a reality), feeding pigs to sheep, and, just for spice, the merits of the vastly superior DVD edition of the Two Towers over the badly edited theatrical version. If you aren't sure who's right and who's wrong just ask yourselves a simple question, "What Would Mark Say?" and the Light of Truth and Goodness will dawn.

Toodles!



Meanwhile, the tragedy of the Evil Party is nowhere more clearly expressed than in the fact that...

...the highest act of moral courage a Dem can muster is to not criticize somebody for intervening to prevent a cold-blooded act of judicial murder.




The Stupid Party, Accomplishing the Absolute Bare Minimum and Treating it Like a Huge Moral Victory
The majority of Americans polled agreed with the ban. Yet it took nearly the entire Bush first term to end the madness. That’s clear evidence that the Conservative Movement has lost its punch, and maybe its passion as well.

The Stupid Party is trying to figure out a way to insure a secure future by not alienating all those tasty voters out there in the Death Party. Easy: be a fiscal conservative and social liberal and tell people that the goal of life is to be rich as Midas and as laissez faire about your sex life as your TV says you should be. Throw in a dollop of Big Government "compassion" and "homeland security" with large, ill-defined goals and means (such as shutting down strip clubs in the interest of "national security" or searching lactating mothers from Lake Wobegon for terrorist weapons at the airport) and you have a winning formula for all sorts of mischief. With luck, we'll avoid too much silliness. But luck doesn't always hold.



Interesting Look at Bush's Peculiar Appeals to England's Protestant Heritage as the Basis of our Common Bond with the Brits

I think Bush is drawing on some reality here. There is a peculiar cultural and religious affinity between the US and the UK. But I also can't help but wonder how the rapidly apostatizing UK looked at this rhetoric. I highly doubt there is much flutter in the English breast over Tyndale, Wesley and Booth these days. These are names that create much more excitement in Colorado Springs than in London.





A reader writes:
Please consider plugging this website on the blog. This is an American Christian couple, Marthame and Elizabeth Sanders, have traveled the Holy Land extensively over the last couple of years, visiting the various Christian communities. Though they are Presbyterian, they are very ecumenical, especially towards Catholics. (Actually, I think the Palestinian Catholics have had quite an impact on them.) Their website is great and gives much insight to what its like for Christians living under the Israeli occupation. The Sanders in Zababdeh.




Why not take all the money given to CCHD and give it to a Catholic Charity?

...or a charity that supports Catholic values such as Human Life or Mercy Corps?



Spent the Day at Grandpa's 80th Birthday Yesterday

A bittersweet affair since Grandma is struggling with Alzheimer's. Strange moment of lucidity and then long fugues of confusion and word salad. Prayers for them would be appreciated.

Now I'm really behind the eight ball workwise, but it was important to be there. Prayer for that would be good too.

Blogging will be terse.


Thursday, November 20, 2003

Bush Revealed to be Anti-Semitic Israel Hater

Doubts wisdom of Apartheid Wall.



Okey doke! Back to Work!

Incommunicado till tomorrow




Why I Don't Get it When People Arguing for the Iraq War Appeal to UN 1441

Either international law matters or it doesn't. Make up your mind.




Religion of Peace Burns Nigerian Churches

Authorities are still not sure whether this was done by Muslims or simply by American Episcopalian members of the Gay Sturmabtielung aiming to bring African churches to heel.



Exquisite

Sometime CAEI reader and well-meaning guy jcecil3 goes to bat against the formidable author of Disputations on the question of "inclusive language". Much hilarity ensues as jcecil pursues his big-hearted but wrong-headed notions based on the popular leftist thesis that "It's all about power" (read the comments boxes attached to the blog entry). My favorite moment is when the wise and witty Peony Moss exults: "So since I'm a woman who feels excluded by so-called "inclusive" language, I'm therefore a sexist and didn't even know it!

I feel so empowered!"
Memo to jcecil: It's not all about power. Lose the Marxist paradigm and you'll take a step closer to reality.





Another Nominee for Parent of the Year Award
Thomas knew Ridgway was a suspect in the Green River case, but she says she let her son play with his child because the killer wasn't targeting young children.

The winner gets a free sleepover at Michael Jackson's ranch.




Bishop Grahmann Wonders What the Point of Background Checks on Michael Jackson Would Be

Actually, the most mystifying thing about this pathetic man is why any parent in their right mind would allow him within a hundred feet of their kid.




The Left Continues to Impress

You know, we have our disagreements on this blog. But they generally strike me as disagreements between reasonable people trying to operate within a civilized and humane tradition of thought. I become all the more appreciative of youse guys when I read the foamings and rantings of those who have rejected that humane tradition of thought in favor of the Deep Thought of the typical leftist cerebrum.

To wit, this story (on the possibility of letting Reagan assassin wannabe John Hinckley out of jail). The story (amazing enough) is nothing compared to these warm sentiments from our deep-thinking and humane representatives of The Better Way Than Christ:
Futomara69 says, "If he had taken out Reagan then, Saddam Hussein would never have gotten those chemical weapons from the Reagan admin, Al Qaeda would never have been formed by CIA blowblack from Reagan admin's meddling in Afghanistan, The whole nightmare of neocon / Bushkrieg wars in the Middle East would never have happened, Reagan would not now be soiling his diapers and drooling on himself, Crappy actors could not be elected governor of California again."

This guy goes on to say, "Please introduce him to Bush/Cheney. Where are guys like John Hinckley when you need them?"

Prof-Anarky says Hinckley belongs on Mt. Rushmore.

rushtheblohard says, "Hinckley to visit GW and Cheney ... we can only hope"

And then twomorecents writes, "Give him an AK47 and a BUsh schedule. That would be the right thing to do"

Fortunately, these people do not have sinful hearts full of murder and hate and they are in no need of a savior. They're beyond all that. They live in a Higher Paradigm.



The Episcopalian Tolerance Regime Consolidates Power, Stifles Free Speech, Smashes Wrongthink

Crushes Dissent

Where orthodoxy is optional, orthodoxy will sooner or later be proscribed.

Welcome to the New World. It's a good thing God is on our side because under other circumstances, our culture is rapidly declaring "good" things that the Catholic tradition calls "sins that cry out out to heaven."


Wednesday, November 19, 2003

If Eisenhower Had Given the Gettyburg Address

I haven't checked these figures but 87 years ago, I think it was, a number of individuals organized a governmental setup here in this country, I believe it covered certain Eastern areas, with this idea they were following up based on a sort of national independence arrangement and the program that every individual is just as good as every other individual. Well, now, of course, we are dealing with this big difference of opinion, you might almost call it a civil disturbance, although I don't like to appear to take sides or name any individuals, and the point is naturally to check up, by actual experience in the field, to see whether any governmental setup with a basis like the one I was mentioning has any validity and find out whether that dedication by those early individuals will pay off in lasting values and things of that kind.

Well, here we are, at the scene where one of these disturbances between different sides got going. We want to pay our tribute to those loved ones, those departed individuals who made the supreme sacrifice here on the basis of their opinions about how this thing ought to be handled. And I would say this. It is absolutely in order to do this.

But if you look at the overall picture of this, we can't pay any tribute -- we can't sanctify this area, you might say -- we can't hallow according to whatever individuals' creeds or faiths, or sort of religious outlooks are involved about this very particular area. It was those individuals themselves, including the enlisted men, very brave individuals, who have given this religious character to the area. The way I see it, the rest of the world will not remember any statements issued here but it will never forget how these men put their shoulders to the wheel and carried out this idea.

Now frankly, our job, the living individuals' job here, is to pick up the burden they made these big efforts here for. It is our job to get on with the assignment -- and from these deceased fine individuals to take extra inspiration for the same theories for which they made such a big contribution. We have to make up our minds right here and now, as I see it, that they didn't put out all that blood, perspiration and -- well -- that they didn't just make a dry run here, and that all of us here, under God, that is, the God of our choice, shall beef up this idea about freedom and liberty and those kind of arrangements, and that government of all individuals, by all individuals, and for the individuals, shall not pass out of the world picture.

Nope. I didn't write it. Some genius wro