> > > > >

Catholic and Enjoying It!

Mark Shea's Blog: So That No Thought of Mine, No Matter How Stupid, Should Ever Go Unpublished Again!


Tips are deeply appreciated! Yes! I do take Credit Cards!

Atom RSS Feed







Gifts from Aquinas and More



CatholicDestination2




Franciscan Friars of the Assumption Province - Religious Vocations for Men


Netflix, Inc.



Little Way Web Store

Hard to find holy cards and photographs of St. Therese imported directly from her store in Lisieux. We specialize in carmelite spirituality and offer a wide selection of books and gifts about carmelite spirituality. This is the website you have been waiting for.


Gethsemane Garden Stones

Stations of the Cross Garden Stepping Stones transform your garden into a Prayer Garden



Check Out "Rock Solid"

Mark Shea's Podcast














Ignatius Press - Catholic Books



























My Site (Mark-Shea.com)
Act One: Writing for Hollywood
AirMaria
American Chesterton Society
Ave Maria Singles
Catherine of Siena Institute
Catholic Educator's Resource Center
Catholic Exchange
Crossroads Initiative
Decent Films
Drudge Report
Exceptional Marriages
Gilbert Magazine
MercatorNet
Peter Kreeft
Mars Hill Review
St. Austin Review
St. Blog's Prayer Network
Star of the Sea: Catholic Resources from Paul Thigpen
<< # St. Blog's Parish ? >>
Jimmy Akin: Defensor Fidei
David Alexander's Man with Black Hat: Zydeco Catholic
Mike Aquilina's Fathers of the Church
Rod Bennett: Tremendous Trifles
Domenico Bettinelli: Very Sensible Guy
Nancy Brown: Flying Stars
Elliot Bougis: Fides, Cogitatio, Actio
Chris Burgwald's Veritas
Cacciaguida: Defending the 12th Century Since the 14th
Catholic World News - Off the Record
Cosmos Liturgy Sex: That About Covers it All
Disputations: Dedicated to Arguing
Ross Douthat: The Atlantic's Most Sensible Writer
Michael Dubruiel's Annunciations: Sanity in Cyberspace
Envoy's Blog: A Banana Republic for Catholic Apologists
Dawn Eden: The Dawn Patrol
Get Religion: The Smartest Blog on the Web about Religion and Media
Dave Hartline: The Catholic Report
Heart, Mind and Strength: The Weblog of Exceptional Marriages and Other Fun Stuff
Intentional Disciples: The Group Blog of the St. Catherine of Siena Institute
Fr. Rob Johansen: Thrownback
Christopher Johnson: Midwest Conservative Journal
Daniel Larison: Eunomia
Fr. Dwight Longenecker: Standing on My Head
White Around the Collar
Mary's Aggies: Aggies for Mary
Mere Comments: Touchstone's blog
Mommentary: Elinor Dashwood's Sensible Blog
Barbara Nicolosi's Church of the Masses
On the Square: The First Things Blog
James Preece: Catholic and Loving it! (Not to be confused with another site of a similar name)
Dale Price: Dyspeptic Mutterings
Scott P. Richert is All About Catholicism
Scrappleface: As Funny as the Onion
The Shrine of the Holy Whapping: Fun Lovin' Catholic Nerds from Notre Dame
Southern Appeal: The Law with 11 Catholic Herbs and Spices
Andrew Sullivan: The 800 Pound Gorilla of the Blogosphere Who is Hopelessly Fuddled about Catholicism and Sex
Mark Sullivan: Irish Elk
Amy Welborn's Charlotte Was Both
What's Wrong with the World: Sane People in Insane Times
Eve Tushnet: Wide Ranging Mind
Daniel Vitz: Committed to an Institute
Vox Nova Blog: An Interest Catholic Group Blog
Zippy Catholic: Committed to Catholic Common Sense
etc


Tuesday, September 30, 2003

Chancery Rats May Have Been Able to Pull this Kind of Garbage in the Past...

...but they had better figure out fast that it won't work anymore.

What's most amazing to me is the level of insecurity such an act bespeaks. After all, it's not like the National Review Board has any power whatsoever. Yet bureaucrats who are *so* used to complete anonymity and the able to work without challenge that even this toothless board frightens them enough to pull a stunt like this.

My takeaway from this is: make life *more* difficult for arrogant bureaucrats with nice disinfectant sunlight.



Michigan Catholic Conference Rewarded for Prostituting Itself in Recent Puff Piece for St. Jennifer Granholm

As a reward for their lickspittle devotion, St. Jennifer vows to spend her time in office helping to create hell on earth. She'll start with a veto of a partial birth abortion ban. Look for the Gaylord Catholic Weakly to write some more adoring crapola.

Meanwhile, one of my readers get's cracking by writing the diocese with some blunt words for one of the many Bishop Quincy Wigglewattles out there:
Bishop Carl F. Mengeling
Diocese of Lansing, Lansing, Michigan

It has come to my attention that your diocesesan newspaper published what is commonly called a "puff piece" on Jennifer Granholm, in which she was offered a platform to promote her views that the Catholic Church should endorse the morality of grave sins against the defenseless unborn and against chastity.

There is a time for every purpose under Heaven. In my communications I try to avoid self-indulgent harshness or negativism, but God help us all, isn't there somebody that loves this sister in Christ enough to get through to her how much supernatural danger she is placing herself in? Some of the sins we commit have wider impact than others, and with greater responsibility in life comes greater potential harm from our sins and greater danger to our immortal souls. Doesn't Gov. Jennifer Granholm understand that when she sets herself up in a public contest with God over who is the most authoritative, she is FORCING God to act? Thus the basic axiom of religion, that at some point GOD - WILL - NOT - BE - MOCKED.

I would sincerely hope that you, as bishop, could be that brother in Christ. Perhaps, if you find it personally difficult, you could assign a priest to the task. And, of course, if the task is beyond the current capabilities of the Diocese of Lansing, the resources of the universal Church are available. I'm sure that something could be arranged for a grave public scandal of this type that your diocese has become involved in. Finally, if you anticipate a long-term inability to deal with grave public scandals, I'm even confident that permanent new administrative arrangements could be made for your diocese, should it be necessary.

This situation is like the mysterious, ugly, and yet compelling attraction we have to watch when a deadly accident is in progress. When Bill Clinton presented himself for and received Holy Communion at a Catholic Mass in South Africa, for obvious and self-admitted political purposes, I literally gasped. It could not turn out well for him. Within months the scandal leading to his public humiliation and impeachment exploded. When California Governor Gray Davis picked a public fight with his bishop over similar issues as Gov. Granholm, within months he was subject to a humiliating recall. What a mercy of God to give them a trial that could be the occasion for them to repent. The very temporal power they had betrayed Christ for was threatened, and they were given a chance to re-evaluate what they had done. But some politicians appear to get away with it. But of course, only apparently to get away with it.

Imagine, just imagine, the reception before the Throne of Justice of a nominally Catholic politician who has actively conspired to degrade the Catholic Church by enmeshing the Church, the Body of Christ, in these horrifying sins. If anyone loves Jennifer Granholm, truly loves her, they would not cease to try to bring her to her senses. God can do all things and we must pray that she repents immediately. If not, she could be honest, and at your direction cease to identify herself as Catholic, and at least avoid a very public form of blasphemy. But if she persists, let us all fervently pray that she will be given merely a public humiliation and loss of power, so that she can escape the unimaginable, unendurable, and eternal pains of Hell.

Please be assured of my prayers for you and especially the Catholic faithful of your diocese.

Long slow pressure. It took a generation to get here. Assume at least a generation to get out.




People Who Won't Take Yes for an Answer

If you are glutton for punishment, you can download this annoying PDF file and read Conspiracy-Minded Trads refusing to take Sr. Lucia's word for it that Russia was consecrated according to the wishes of Our Lady of Fatima.

I *so* don't care about this stuff, but it's a huge deal for some folks who have Definite Theories About Things and who just can't seem to get it through their heads that Sr. Lucia really does say what she says. The perfect topic for tinfoil hat wearers.

It reminds me greatly of exchanges like this relentless quest to avoid the obvious after the healing of the blind man, recorded in the gospel of John, chapter 9:
The neighbors and those who had seen him before as a beggar, said, “Is not this the man who used to sit and beg?” 9 Some said, “It is he”; others said, “No, but he is like him.” He said, “I am the man.” 10 They said to him, “Then how were your eyes opened?” 11 He answered, “The man called Jesus made clay and anointed my eyes and said to me, ‘Go to Siloam and wash’; so I went and washed and received my sight.” 12 They said to him, “Where is he?” He said, “I do not know.”
13 They brought to the Pharisees the man who had formerly been blind. 14 Now it was a sabbath day when Jesus made the clay and opened his eyes. 15 The Pharisees again asked him how he had received his sight. And he said to them, “He put clay on my eyes, and I washed, and I see.” 16 Some of the Pharisees said, “This man is not from God, for he does not keep the sabbath.” But others said, “How can a man who is a sinner do such signs?” There was a division among them. 17 So they again said to the blind man, “What do you say about him, since he has opened your eyes?” He said, “He is a prophet.”
18 The Jews did not believe that he had been blind and had received his sight, until they called the parents of the man who had received his sight, 19 and asked them, “Is this your son, who you say was born blind? How then does he now see?” 20 His parents answered, “We know that this is our son, and that he was born blind; 21 but how he now sees we do not know, nor do we know who opened his eyes. Ask him; he is of age, he will speak for himself.” 22 His parents said this because they feared the Jews, for the Jews had already agreed that if any one should confess him to be Christ, he was to be put out of the synagogue. 23 Therefore his parents said, “He is of age, ask him.”
24 So for the second time they called the man who had been blind, and said to him, “Give God the praise; we know that this man is a sinner.” 25 He answered, “Whether he is a sinner, I do not know; one thing I know, that though I was blind, now I see.” 26 They said to him, “What did he do to you? How did he open your eyes?” 27 He answered them, “I have told you already, and you would not listen. Why do you want to hear it again? Do you too want to become his disciples?” 28 And they reviled him, saying, “You are his disciple, but we are disciples of Moses. 29 We know that God has spoken to Moses, but as for this man, we do not know where he comes from.” 30 The man answered, “Why, this is a marvel! You do not know where he comes from, and yet he opened my eyes. 31 We know that God does not listen to sinners, but if any one is a worshiper of God and does his will, God listens to him. 32 Never since the world began has it been heard that any one opened the eyes of a man born blind. 33 If this man were not from God, he could do nothing.” 34 They answered him, “You were born in utter sin, and would you teach us?” And they cast him out.

There are two reasons people ask questions. The first is to find things out. The second is to keep from finding things out.



What a weird coincidence

Another priest busted for soliciting sex with minors turns out to be gay! What are the odds of that? Well, I guess life sometime just deals us these freaky thunderbolts out of a blue sky.

What seminary did this priest go to and when? His portrayal is, shall we say, "Rose-y". Is he describing the situation as he knew in the 80s or more recently?



From our "God is Not Mocked" Dept.

I hope the guy is having an instructive and fruitful Purgatory. May he find the mercy he very badly needed.



The First Rule for Catholic Democrats...

...sell your soul to Moloch.

The devil took Clark, Kennedy, Granholm and Kucinich to a very high mountain, and showed them all the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them; and he said to them, “All these I will give you, if you will fall down and worship me.” Then they said to him, “We'll do anything for power! Anything! You want dead babies? I'm cool with that! Just. Give. Me. Power!"




Vultures Gather, Caw Inane Pontifications

... such as, "The big question on Catholics' minds is who's running the show."

Ever hear of the Holy Spirit?

This is what happens when you turn reporters loose who don't have a frickin' clue about the Faith and encourage them to confidently hold forth on it. They just make such screaming ignoramuses of themselves sometimes because they just cannot believe that Church is more than a particularly lucky political institution that somehow managed to make it to the 21st Century.

Oh, and Richard McBrien, of course, gets to do his yip dog schtick. It's all so old. So utterly *old*.




As Tim Drake is About to Demonsrate in an upcoming National Catholic Register piece...

...your noisemaking to chancery rats about antics like this really is noticed (and even lied about--a sign you make them very nervous).

Long, sloooooow, steady pressure. Two steps forward, one step back. Keep up the pressure. These bureaucrats who promote and fly cover for this crap seem not to have had to endure much public scrutiny for a long time.




Did you hear about the Nerd who went to Hell?

He was cast into Outer Dorkness.

Add your own joke below. I gotta go work now.



A year from now, the Feds will cautiously acknowledge that this *might* have something to do with terrorism

Doesn't *everybody* take a strenuous hike over boulders with camera equipment to go photograph nuke plants? My family does that every Sunday after church.



Very Nice Encomium to Ronald Reagan by Andrew Sullivan

I've always thought the chattering class buffoons who believed their own press clippings about how stupid Reagan was were simply revealing their own shallowness. I think the same thing of the ninnies who are too dumb to do anything but repeat the mantra that Bush is dumb.




Gaylord Diocesan Paper Does Adoring Lickspittle Puff Piece on Pro-Abort Fanatic Gov. Granholm

HMS blog is on the case and has the contact info for (politely!) registering your displeasure at this sort of "AmChurch-as-Democratic-Party-at-Prayer" bullshit.



One thing I've never understood

...is the strange need, particularly among some Protestants but also among Rad Trads, to make sure that Catholics exclude as many people as possible from any knowledge whatsoever of the One True God.

It's weird really. Paul could look at the Athenian worship of the "Unknown God" and acknowledge that they were on to *something*. He could write, "I ask, then, has God rejected his people? By no means!" Nostra Aetate can say of Muslims, "They adore the one God, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth". It can write of Jews, "Although the Church is the new people of God, the Jews should not be presented as rejected or accursed by God, as if this followed from the Holy Scriptures." And it can call non-Catholic Christians, "separated brethren."

As a former non-Catholic Christian who has experience first hand the reality that God does not play "Simon Peter says" with grace but gives it to anybody who seeks it, I've never had a big problem with this aspect of the Church's teaching. The gospel reading this past Sunday was all about this: "He who is not against us is for us" says Jesus to the disciples who are so eager to say, "That guy over there working miracles in your name is not one of us." Jesus' answer is common sense itself: "If he's obeying me, he's obeying me. Stop treating my grace like a private club."

And yet, now I'm confronted by the amazing spectacle of Protestants in my comments box who simultaneously demand that I regard as Beyond the Pale of contact with God certain people whom *they* deem to be Outside while they *also* demand that, as a Catholic, I regard their particular breach with the Church as perfectly fine. It is tempting, of course, to reply (as I did tongue in cheek down below) that I will not have communication with Vile Heretics who are fit only for everlasting damnation since they are not visible members of the One True Church and then turn on my heel and walk away shouting "Repent Heretic!" over my shoulder. I mean, talk about living in glass houses!

But, for the irony-impaired, I won't do that here. I will simply note that saying "somebody who grasps part of the truth should be encouraged to grasp all of it" is generally a wiser course of action than saying "That guy over there grasps a different or smaller part of the truth than I do! Away with him!"



A Good Man Needs our Prayers

May God grant him the strength to carry the cross where He wills and, when his work is done, to enter the Joy forever and ever and ever, through Christ our Lord.

Thanks, Papa. You're one in a million!



Hoo boy! The Dems Have Picked Themselves a Winner This Time!

I await his views on Superheros and Genetically-Engineered Dinosaurs.



More People in Need of Insensitivity Training

The ADL's predictably hysterical position is, as far as I can see, identical to that of ignorant censorious "offended" people who are too stupid to care what Huckleberry Finn actually says. It has the word "nigger" in it and so the whole book is rendered ritually unclean.



California Stupid Party Acquires One Ring

Party sources explain, "We're just keeping it safe. We're not going to do bad things with it like the Evil Party does. We're different."



Zing!



Youch! Day by Day is wicked some days.


Monday, September 29, 2003

In Florida, If You Want to Kill People, It Should be Handled by Qualified Medical Professionals...

The peculiar mark of our culture is that it cares more about aesthetics and tastefulness than it does about human life. The city fathers in Terri Schiavo's town have been remarkably slow to pass similar anti-euthanasia measures, merely because the aesthetics of killing her are more sterile and clinical--like a tasteful scene from a Kubrick film--and therefore it's Okay.




Hey! Why Kill Only the Ill?

Oh, but euthanasia will *never* lead to a debased society or anything. Nope. The West is simply superior to the Islamosphere. When *we* kill innocent people, it's not for some barbaric notion of honor, ginned up by furious passions and primitive religion. Nosirree, when we kill innocent people, we do it in a cold, clinical, detached way for reasons of efficiency and actuarial tables. A little needle prick and you just fade out. That's progress, you see?



Superior Western Culture...

gotta export this to a world that needs the secular salvation only America can provide!



I sometimes think that Radical Traditionalism....

...can be defined as the hope that as few people as possible find everlasting life. The weird pretzel-like logic of this HMS blog reader, for instance, veers clean into Marcionism in the peculiar attempt to deny the rather obvious teaching of the Church (a teaching dating back to the New Testament in the case of Jews and to Gregory VII in the case of Muslims), that the three Great Monotheisms all worship the God of Abraham.

St. John warns against those who "run ahead" of the Church, whether to open the door of universalism or to slam them shut in a fit of Calvinism. I can understand wanting to be cautious and not be mistaken for saying that "We worship the same God" means "All are saved." What I don't understand is the eagerness to deny the plain teaching of the Church that Muslims and Jews do, indeed, worship the same God. It's as though some people are afraid that this *might* mean some are saved and this must, at all costs, be prevented. There's a sort of chintziness of spirit at work there. A kind of *hope* that as many as possible be excluded.

Very sad.



Fr. Rob Johansen on Hell

Of course, I shouldn't be blogging this since I was informed by my resident hysteric (now, sadly, banished to the Outer Darkness where their worm does not die and their fire is not quenched) that I believe in automatic heaven for everybody whether they repent or not. But since I myself can't recall ever having that opinion, I thought I'd go ahead and post this anyway.



The Murderous Brittleness of Foaming Bronze Age Fanatic Religion

Things you'll never read:
Dear EWTN Moral Theology Expert:

My daughter is dressing provocatively and running with the wrong crowd. What should I do?

Concerned.

-------

Dear Concerned:

Honor demands that you stab your daughter 11 times, then break through the bathroom door where she has barricaded herself in terror, slit her throat like a pig, and let her bleed to death. This will please God.

Signed,

Catholic Theology Expert

Much as idiots would like to insist it's not so, there are some real differences between Christianity and Islam.




I discovered a quick way to be labeled a "Jew-hater", a total supporter of the EU, and somebody who agrees with Everything Every Cardinal in the Vatican Has Ever uttered politically

Just remark that "celebrating" the death of Edward Said is ugly and un-Christian, and you can get these and many other remarkable opinions attributed to you by hysterics, as well as accusations about how you have cleverly and deviously failed to renounce your implied endorsement of all of Said's works and ways.

In reality, I have nothing to say about him beyond my brief denunciation of the allegedly "Christian" Apostles of Hatred who go around "celebrating" the deaths of various people, because I've not read him and know very little about him. I remark on the ugliness of a "Christian" who "celebrates" his death because the teaching of my Faith is that we are to celebrate the death of no human being, not even our worst enemy for the simple reason that God does not (Ezekiel 18:32). However, as some abundantly demonstrate, the word of God is not nearly as important as politics. Their pathetic eagerness to *defend* the idea that a man's death should be "celebrated" is just pitiable. Their assumption that contempt for such "celebration" simply *has* to mean that I endorse Said's politics (about which I know very little) is, well, a rather unsurprising testimony to the fact that they assess the world according to the canons of conservative politics rather than according to the Revelation (just as others assess the world according to the canons of liberal politics rather than according to the Revelation.) I try, not always with success, to assess the world according to the Revelation, which tends to put me at odds with everybody, including myself, sooner or later. I find repugnant the school of thought that says, "Yeah, Jesus said 'Love your enemies'. But he didn't really mean Edward Said. It's okay to "celebrate" his death and, in fact, people who criticize such celebrations must be Jew-haters." I urge such people to consider it possible that I might find "celebrating" somebody's death repugnant, not because I'm a "Jew hater" but because I take seriously the Jewish prophet Ezekiel, who spoke by the Holy Spirit when he wrote, "I have no pleasure in the death of any one, says the Lord GOD".

More proof that The Most Scandalous Command in the gospel is the command to forgive and love your enemy. Fasting or abstention from sex is a cakewalk compared to it.



Rod Dreher writes:
I just put a blog up on the DMN site bitching about NPR's reporting of the naming of the new cardinals, and praising John Allen for setting Bob Edwards straight this morning. Edwards, on Morning Edition, started his phone interview with JA by saying that John Paul is known to have spent his papacy appointing only fellow conservatives to the college of cardinals. Allen corrected him, and said that while solid conservatives like George Pell got the nod, there were center-left archbishops who were also selected. Allen indicated by his comments that the next consistory is going to be a lot more diverse in terms of sensibilities and debate than many might think. Allen also shot down that usual cliche of American reporting on the Vatican: that X. was done because the Pope is frail. When Edwards suggested this consistory was called now because the Pope is ailing, Allen said the truth is rather more mundane. Rome likes to have 120 cardinals of voting age at all times, and the number has now slipped to 109. Besides, consistories are held every three years for the most part, and it's just about time for a new one. They're doing it a little bit early because all the world's cardinals are going to be in Rome for the pope's 25th anniversary in October, and Mother Teresa's beatification. So it made sense to do it now.

The American media irritate me greatly.

I've read the latest Word from Rome, and Allen says in it he keeps hammering away at the point that few seem to understand: the college of cardinals is a pretty diverse lot, and the next consistory is going to surprise lots of people.

Sounds like more graduates of the "Frail Pope Cracks Down on Bush's Lack of Gravitas" school of Mindless Cliche-Ridden Journalism.

John Allen is a valuable natural resource.



Many, many heaps and gobs of thankful gratitudinosity (and the surprise win of yesterday's Pledge Week Last Day Contest)

Still no final count cuz I'm waiting for various checks to come in (don't forget to send 'em!), but the Pledge Drive has brought in at least 3100 badly needed dollars. To all who have contributed by either buying stuff or through donations and prayers (and these last are vital!) I thank you from the bottom of my heart.

Now a bit of a surprise for you: two winners tied for the biggest gift donation yesterday: Katherine Coolidge and Jason Carter. So if y'all will kindly go here and peruse which book or tape you'd like and then (without ordering anything from the site) email me your snail mail address with your selection, I will see that it goes out post haste.

Again, thanks to y'all! We shall use these badly needed funds in a wild and wasteful debauch of buying that fit our rapidly growing 6 year old, for the dentist, and for such luxuries as killing the carpenter ant infestation, and for paying off the tax guy. Remember that verse from the gospel yesterday about not losing your reward for a cup of cold water. That'd be you.

Okay. No more money talk till the next Pledge Week in December (though, of course, I welcome free will offerings (via the convenient PayPal button on the left) and grubby capitalistic purchases of my books and tapes any time)!



My heart bleeds for "disappointed" Australian dissenting Catholics

Wait till they get a load of their long-awaited Vatican III and blow a gasket.



John Pacheco (St. Blog's Wannabe Man in Canadian Politics) Gives His Version of the Debate

(and requests your prayers for his campaign).



From our "Show me a Culture that Despises Virginity" files

Lesbian dolls for grade school kids.



New film out based on John

I'm rather skeptical of these things as drama. The idea of simply treating the gospels like a movie script strikes me as tone deaf both to the sort of literature the gospels are and the sort of art cinema is. I never much cared for the "Jesus Movie" they did of Luke 20 years ago either.

By the way, the article mentions the alleged "anti-semitism" of John (favorite evidence in favor of the case for the prosecution: John 8:44 "You are of your father the devil". For the real lowdown on what John is up to in this passage, here is an excerpt from the Catholic Scripture Study of the gospel of John I wrote with Scott Hahn last year:
Baptism, Original Sin, and the Children of Abraham

A frequent charge made by critics of the New Testament is that John is anti-semitic. Texts such as John 8:44 ("You are of your father the devil…") appear to give weight to that charge. However, to lift that quote from its context is to misread it badly, for a number of reasons.

First, there is the obvious fact that it is spoken by a Jew to Jews. But more than this, it is necessary to understand both to whom Jesus is speaking, to whom John the Evangelist is speaking, and why.

Let's re-examine the passage:

Jesus said to them, "If you were Abraham's children, you would do what Abraham did, but now you seek to kill me, a man who has told you the truth which I heard from God; this is not what Abraham did. You do what your father did." They said to him, "We were not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God." Jesus said to them, "If God were your Father, you would love me, for I proceeded and came forth from God; I came not of my own accord, but he sent me. Why do you not understand what I say? It is because you cannot bear to hear my word. You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies (John 8:40).

Many people make the mistake of thinking that Jesus is here excoriating his old enemies, the Pharisees (a common and forgivable misunderstanding since Jesus does have many harsh words for them elsewhere such as Matthew 23). But in reality, this passage is spoken, amazingly enough, to "the Jews who had believed in him" (John 8:31). In short, it's "interested inquirers"--"catechumens", if you will--not hostile Pharisees, who are told they are children of the devil!

Why? Because, as we have been pointing out, the whole passage from about John 7 through John 9 is one huge comment on original sin and the necessity of baptism. And the reality of original sin and the necessity of baptism is the very first fact catechumens need to encounter.

All through the dialogues from John 7 (when Jesus promises the "living water") to the present passage, we have seen crowds argue and split over Jesus. Some reject him outright, others (such as the Jews in v. 31) "believe" in him with mere human faith. They are interested. They want to know more. He is the next Sensation, the current headline, and they want to hear what this out-of-town oddball has to say. But Jesus is not interested in being a Sensation. He is interested in speaking the truth. So Jesus tells his hearers, in effect, that they are slaves to sin and that only he can set them free. They are children of the devil, slaves of the prince of the power of the air. But this is not because they are Jews and therefore peculiarly evil. It is because they are fallen and therefore just like everybody else. Indeed, this is the same sort of language St. Paul will later use to describe the Ephesians (who are largely Gentiles, not Jews) before their Baptism (Ephesians 2:1-2). In short, the problem with Jesus' hearers in John 8 is not that they are Jews, but that they are fallen, like the rest of the human race. So far from being uniquely evil, they are in the same boat as the rest of us. We are all, insofar as we are fallen, children of the devil.

This enrages his "believing" hearers, who appeal precisely to their ethnicity as somehow exempting them from original sin: "Abraham is our father" (v. 39). Jesus, again like Paul in Romans 9, argues that mere physical descent from Abraham is insufficient. The background to Jesus' reply, as to Romans 9, is the distinction between being "children of the flesh" and "children of the spirit". Jesus has already distinguished between flesh and spirit in John 3 and again in John 6. Paul does something similar in Romans 9 when he writes:

For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all are children of Abraham because they are his descendants; but "Through Isaac shall your descendants be named." This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are reckoned as descendants (Romans 9:6-8).

Jesus is making essentially the same point. The "children of the promise" are those who receive both the bad news that they are sinners and the good news that the Messiah has come to give them eternal life through baptism and participation in the divine life--a participation that is a work of grace, not an achievement of human strength.

Jesus tells his humanly "believing" hearers that he is aware of their anger and knows that they want to kill him. This too reflects Paul's remark that "the desires of the flesh are against the Spirit, and the desires of the Spirit are against the flesh; for these are opposed to each other" (Galatians 5:17) and his comment that "those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh, but those who live according to the Spirit set their minds on the things of the Spirit. To set the mind on the flesh is death, but to set the mind on the Spirit is life and peace. For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God; it does not submit to God's law, indeed it cannot; and those who are in the flesh cannot please God" (Romans 8:5-8). Jesus' hearers are, whether they realize it or not, still in the thrall of the "flesh" that opposes the Spirit and cannot be free of it by mere human "belief" in Jesus. They must be children of Abraham according to the promise, having the faith and not merely the DNA of Abraham.

Jesus points this out too and reminds "the Jews who had believed in him" that the test of whether we really are sons of God is not our family album, but our response to Christ. If we want to kill him, we don't believe God, whatever we say. They argue further (note again the ethnic focus--and attempted slur--in v. 48), with the result that when Jesus makes the supreme revelation of what they will be required to believe if they are serious ("Before Abraham was, I am" (v. 58)) they try to kill him--proving Jesus' point. They have not been truly enlightened since their faith was merely human, not supernatural. Such supernatural enlightenment is the gift of the Holy Spirit in Baptism, not a human achievement. The "catechumens" end up with hardened hearts.

For this reason, John will (as we shall see in Lesson 12), continue the story by at last showing us the story of the Blind Man, who will experience both enlightenment and healing (and true supernatural faith in Jesus Christ) when he washes at the Pool of Siloam--an image of Baptism. In short, the first person to experience true liberation from sin will not be the "interested inquirers" of John 8 who reject the idea they are fallen sinners in need, like the rest of the human race, of supernatural grace and whose pride gets in the way of their listening. It will be the blind man who is "baptized" in the pool of Siloam and who comes away seeing. And not just seeing physically. He recognizes that Jesus is the Messiah and worships him.

So the point of the passage is not "Jews are satanic". The point is "Humans are fallen and in need of Baptism and physical descendants of Abraham are no exception."

If you haven't checked out Catholic Scripture Study, a *free* downloadable Bible study offered by Catholic Exchange and written by Scott Hahn and I (among other folks), you should. Best Catholic Bible study available, in my not so humble opinion.




Thinks Prolifers are Idiots but, like Arnold, He's an Entertainment Icon

....so, of course, the Stupid Party wants him.



The one thing every prophetic voice needs to memorize

Interesting piece on lonely conservative voices in the goose-step culture of academic leftism. What stands out is this passage:
These dissenters lead interesting lives. But there's one circumstance that causes true anguish: when a bright conservative student comes to them and says he or she is thinking about pursuing an academic career in the humanities or social sciences.

"This is one of the most difficult things," says Alan Kors, a rare conservative at Penn. "One is desperate to see people of independent mind willing to enter the academic world. On the other hand, it is simply the case they will be entering hostile and discriminatory territory."

Everybody who wants to be a prophet needs to memorize this passage from Isaiah 6:8-13:
And I heard the voice of the Lord saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?” Then I said, “Here am I! Send me.” And he said, “Go, and say to this people: ‘Hear and hear, but do not understand; see and see, but do not perceive.’ Make the heart of this people fat, and their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their hearts, and turn and be healed.” Then I said, “How long, O Lord?” And he said: “Until cities lie waste without inhabitant, and houses without men, and the land is utterly desolate, and the Lord removes men far away, and the forsaken places are many in the midst of the land. And though a tenth remain in it, it will be burned again, like a terebinth or an oak, whose stump remains standing when it is felled." The holy seed is its stump.

Translation: the life of prophet is typically, in the world, one of failure. People won't listen. You won't be vindicated till it's too late (usually well after your lifetime). The calling of a real prophet is generally only rewarded in heaven.

This is not to equate political conservatism with the voice of God. Temporal and political prophets (like, say, Winston Churchill in the 30s) sometimes get to say, "See! Toldja so!" in their lifetimes (though at horrendous cost). But the prophets of God almost never (JPII was a rare exception with the fall of communism, though some of his prophetic statements with regard to the West go unheeded to this hour).



A reader writes:
I watched the first episode of "Joan of Arcadia" Friday night. With
one exception it wasn't too bad. The premise, that God appears to a teen-aged girl in various guises and talks to her, is strange, but given that God spoke to Moses through a burning bush and He speaks to all of us in one way or another, although usually not identifying Himself, not unacceptable. However, one scene was ridiculous. Joan's mother, who is upset by various problems, sees a priest standing on a street with a kettle hanging from a tripod, collecting money for the homeless. Priests don't collect money on the street, nor do most ministers. That's a specialty of the Salvation Army and I think that during Christmas they frequently used paid employees to ring the bell next to the kettle. There's nothing wrong with collecting contributions that way, but it isn't the way priests do it. However, that's minor except that it shows the people responsible for the program have no interest in accuracy. The bit with Joan's mother repeatedly starting to leave and turning around to stuff more money in the kettle probably was there because someone suffered from the delusion that it was funny, but it was not otherwise objectionable. However, when she asked the priest why God lets people suffer he acted as if he had never encountered that question before. It is a question that never can be answered completely, which is one reason it's called the problem of evil, but a lot can be said about it. I've never been near a seminary but I assume that any priest would not only have studied the problem in philosophy and theology classes, he would have been taught how to help people who asked questions like that in classes in pastoral counseling or something like that. Also, any priest who had been ordained more than a few weeks would be likely to have been asked that question before. What on Earth were the writers thinking when they wrote that nonsense?. Even I could give an answer. It would be more academic than pastoral, but it would be better than what the priest said. Oh well, at least they got one thing right. When he said he would pray for her and she asked what he would say he replied that he would say, "God, help that woman who's so upset." (Not a literal quote but close enough.)

Also, when God first speaks to Joan she says something about Him in the Old Testament and He replies, "I come across better in the New Testament and the Koran." I suppose that's just obligatory political correctness, but I don't like it.



An unexpectedly tender bit of prose from the normally acidic Christopher Hitchens

in memory of Edward Said.

A marked contrast from some of the allegedly Christian Apostles of Hatred who lurk St. Blog's comments boxes and who "celebrate" Said's death.



For all you poor saps in Cleveland...

I recommend James Akin's handy little guide Mass Confusion: The Do's and Don'ts of Catholic Worship

A useful book for anybody suffering under the regime of liturgists who think Jesus' command was "Peter, try experiments on my rats."



Now they tell us...



Cleveland Diocese Institutes New "Rite of Confusion"

The plan appears to be to ask people to do stuff if they feel like it and then sit back and laugh while Mr. Smith attempts to follow the new protocol while Mrs. Jones refuses to.

This will create "unity" in some Pickwickian sense understood only by liturgists. It's already transform our parish from one in which everybody used to kneel after communion into one in which half the congregation stands until the communion rite is over and the other half kneels after the first communion hymn is over.

Who are the clowns who come up with these brilliant ideas?




Greg Popcak speaks common sense

Be sure to write Cdl. Maida and give him an "atta boy."



And in the hands of Hillary, it will be put to even more ingenious uses...

Dr. Frankenstein, call your office.



Indulging One of the Most Primal Appetites of the Human Species

I give you (courtesy of the indefatigable Fr. Bryce Sibley) this site, dedicated to making the biblical case for polygamy. (And don't forget to check out their extra-special "Christian Polygamy Fairy Tales" link.

And, along with these offerings, I will now indulge an urge more primal than the sexual drive, more fundamental than the need for food: the urge to say, "I told you so!"

Oh, that felt good!



Hard Cases Make Bad Law or...

"French Pro-Euthanasia Forces Score Big Propaganda Victory in Their Struggle to Complete What Hitler Began"





Always a hopeful sign when examination of conscience gets serious consideration

...in the pages of the NY Times no less!



Why Christ Commands Us to Forgive

Because if you don't, you are in prison forever, eternally bound by the person who victimized you, longer after he's dead.

Exhibit A: Those who can't let go even when their victimizer "escaped justice" by being stomped to death by a Nazi.
Mitchell Garabedian, who represents many of Geoghan's alleged victims, called for the law to be changed.

"It's as though the reporting of Father John J. Geoghan's sexual abuse, his trial, and the jury decision never existed,'' Garabedian said.

Exhibit B: Those who have let go and are finding peace:
Ralph DelVecchio, 47, who settled the claim that Geoghan molested him when he was a child, said the vacated conviction means little to him.

"To be honest with you, I'm not paying any attention to this stuff any more,'' he said. ``I settled things, I know what's what, and I moved on with my life.''



Tom Shales and Big Think

Tom Shales suffers from one of the most ancient prejudices of the human race: the notion that God is primarily interested in Important People...
"So let's get our bearings. We are living here on a planet in shambles, terrorists running murderously amok, the Mideast on the verge of exploding, humanity plagued by hateful prejudices that go back centuries, poverty and depravity rampant, and when God decides to intervene, it's to straighten out a few troubled folks in a small town and solve a murder case? It's just too ridiculous."

Wait'll the guy hears that God became incarnate in some pokey little burg called "Nazareth" and, instead of busying himself in the intrigues of the Augustan court or brokering a peace treaty between Parthia and the Roman Empire, took a marked interest in the trivial lives of some Palestinian peasants whose names are, for the most part, lost to history. He had the completely anti-statistical notion that the one lost sheep was more important than the ninety-nine.

"For consider your call, brethren; not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth; but God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong, God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are, so that no human being might boast in the presence of God. He is the source of your life in Christ Jesus, whom God made our wisdom, our righteousness and sanctification and redemption; therefore, as it is written, “Let him who boasts, boast of the Lord.” - 1 Cor 1:26-31

The temptation to Big Think is always with us. Here's a piece I wrote on that temptation once.



Iraq bishop says media distorts coverage to discredit US-led war

One aspect of modernity that frustrates me greatly is that we are *totally* dependent on the press for our picture of everything that is going on in any field beyond our immediate experience. Whenever the press actually talks about something I know something about, they almost always get things wrong (usually in small ways but sometimes in big ones). Really, this takes me back to "Vatican crackdowns" and "plunging buses". Reporters have a job to do very quickly. So they tend to rely on getting a sort of template going and then feed data into the template. Things that don't fit the template tend not to be noticed. Thus, when "Veritatis Splendor" came out the thoughtful media analysis was the Usual Crap about sex, as though that was the subject of the encyclical.

In the same way, coverage of the aftermath of the war has left me with the same sense that coverage of the ramp-up to the war did: that I'm stuck with trying to parse the situation in Iraq based on the testimony of people who know about as much about Iraq as they do about Veritatis Splendor. And I'm supposed to make an intelligent political decision based on this....

Argh.



The New Season for the Seattle G.K. Chesterton Society is about to Debut

Our first offering:

Oct. 15, 7:30, Casey Commons, Seattle University. Todd Rendleman, Ph.D., Department of Communication, Seattle Pacific University.

"The Action of Mercy: A Flannery O'Connor Performance Hour." Co-sponsored by the Washington Commission for the Humanities.

If you live in the area, come check out the Chesterton Society for one of the coolest lay Catholic apostolates devoted to cultivating the life of the mind.


Saturday, September 27, 2003

Good Morning! It's Day 7 of the Quarterly Catholic and Enjoying It! Pledge Week

It's the Sabbath. I'm resting. However, Scripture clearly says it's lawful to do good works on the Sabbath. Supporting yer emphatically lower middle class scribe as he tries to do his apostolic thang is a good work. So make this pledge week go out with a real bang! The person to donate the largest amount today--Day 7--will get a free signed copy of whichever one of my books you would like.

Of course, you can still buy my books and tapes too. And if you'd rather not do the PayPal thang, feel free to email me and ask for my snailmail address. I'll happily take a check instead.



Grief

So long Donald O'Connor.

One of the most underrated performers in the history of the movies has died with the same class wit and charm that made him great:
In a brief statement, the family said that among O'Connor's last words was the following quip: "I'd like to thank the Academy for my lifetime achievement award that I will eventually get."

He was, by all accounts, a very decent and modest man, as well as, in my opinion, one of the greatest triple threats ever to grace the screen with brilliant dancing, great singing and comic chops that were without peer. Singin' in the Rain, the all-time greatest musical comedy ever made in the history of the entire universe, was as much his film as Gene Kelly's or Debbie Reynolds'.

I shall miss him greatly. May his soul and all the souls of the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace.


Friday, September 26, 2003

Good Morning! It's Day 6 of the Quarterly Catholic and Enjoying It! Pledge Week

We're in the Home Stretch of the Great Autumn Drive. You've done a phenomenal job so far and my dentist, exterminator, plumber, IRS collector, kids and mortgage really appreciate it--though not as much as I do. However, we have two more days to go and can use much more oomph as we approach the finish line!

Please consider a gift to your humble scribe and click on the PayPal button to the left so that C&EI can stay on the air and six year old Sean get his broken tooth fixed. You can either make a straight donation or, if you like to get something for your money (beyond this blog, I mean), you can buy my books and tapes. And if you'd rather not do PayPal, feel free to email me and ask for my snailmail address. I'll happily take a check instead.

Today's your day. All this week, other people have been pitching in to help out. Now the little angel on your shoulder (you know the one that looks just like you with the little tinfoil halo?) is saying, "C'mon, do the right thing! You *love* this blog!"

Remember, if you are interested in my books, don't buy them from Amazon cuz if you do, they get all the money and I get a piddly amount. Get them from me and I'll happily autograph them!



Vote for McClintock!

But he'll make the Stupid Party lose in California!

[Evil grin]. Yep. Sure will!

You see, the leadership of the Stupid Party has traditionally held prolife conservatives at arms distance, but still firmly by the family jewels, saying, "Hey! If you don't support us, the Evil Party will win. You wouldn't want that now, would you?"

It's like a Mafia Protection Racket.

Well, now the leading Stupid Party Candidate in California is indistinguishable from Hillary except for a couple of vague points vaguely suggesting some vague misgivings about Partial Birth Abortion.

Whoopti-frickin-do.

The Feds can give us a Partial Birth Abortion Ban. Who cares what the governor of California does.

So basically there's no reason to vote for Arnold. I say, "Vote for McClintock, give the state to the Dems, and make it extremely clear to the Stupid Party that they can't treat their base like shit and expect to succeed."

Exorcise the Spirit of Rockefeller! Vote for McClintock. Hand cynics running the Stupid Party a well-deserved defeat.



Have I mentioned lately how worthless and unreliable Haloscan is?



A bit early, but still majorly cool

What's most impressive is that they kept the meaning, meter and the rhyme:

Rudolphus, naso rubro,
naso nitidissimo,
si umquam eum spectes,
dicas eum fulgere.
Reliqui tum renones
deridebant ludentes,
semper vetabant eum
apud ludos ludere.

Deinde ante natalem
Santa venit, et
"Tu, Rudolphe nitide,
traham meam duc nocte."
Dein, ut renones amant,
exclamantes hilare:
"Rudolphe, naso rubro,
in annalibus eris!"



Mark Adams writes with a favor to ask youse guys:
I just learned that I will be traveling on press junket to Jordan sponsored by the Catholic Near East Welfare Association.

Could I be so bold as to ask you to ask your readers for good resources to learn about Jordan; its history, government, current issues, etc... preferably online as I probably won't have time to order and read entire books.

Also if they have suggestions for storylines to pursue while I am there that would also be helpful.

Thanks for any help and God bless.

Mark Adams
Church Today, Editor
Alexandria, Louisiana



This...

reminds me of my favorite apocryphal nun story about the sign on the convent grounds that read: "Trespassers will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law" and was undersigned, "The Sisters of Mercy".



Check out the Capuchin Franciscans!

They've got a nifty new permalink icon rightcheer on my blog over on the left rail. They're the Province to which Archbishop Sean O'Malley belongs.



The surest sign the Dems really believe their own propaganda about Bush

"He's a brainless sock puppet for powerful interests who only knows what to say because his handlers feed him his lines!"

That's the Dem drill on Bush. The trouble with the Dems is that they really believe this and, because Bush has been quite popular for a disturbing amount of time, they draw only one conclusion:

"We need a brainless sock puppet for powerful interests who only knows what to say because his handlers feed him his lines!"

And that, children, is how Wesley Clark was magically anointed the "front runner" even though he has no idea what positions he holds on a host of major issues.




Steve Greydanus on Luther

Steve's more charitable than I am. The film appears to be a very well-made tissue of lies, hagiography, demonization, and half-truths. Not surprising, but still disappointing.

Because the film now appears guaranteed to make its (few) viewers stupider about what Catholics believe than they were before they saw it, I offer as a small corrective a couple of articles on what the Church actually teaches about Purgatory and Indulgences.



Infantilized Minority Brownshirts on the March

More people in need of Insensitivity Training and bent on crushing any speech that makes them feel uncomfortable.



Feminist Brownshirts on the March!

How long till Women's Ordination is mandated as a Basic Civil Right and Wrong Thinking is punished accordingly by Caesar?



The California Stupid Party Gets in Touch with its Inner Rockefeller

Who cares if his positions are indistinguishable from Hillary Clinton's? He can *win*!



Michelle at And Then? argues with my blog about Edgardo Mortara

Fair enough. I think her criticisms are just.



Everything that's wrong with the phony sacrament of confession that is secularized psychology

Emily Peterson of After abortion writes
Yesterday's edition of the Dr. Phil show (television) showed a couple
suffering MAJOR problems because an abortion when they were engaged. I
wrote on it
:

Incredibly enough, yesterday's edition of the Dr. Phil show dealt with a couple suffering major sex problems as the result of an abortion.

Some quotes from the show:

"Tripp is one of the 20 million men in America who suffer from erectile dysfunction, and the condition has prevented him from consummating his two-and-a-half year marriage to Michelle. 'It's like a cancer eating me from the inside out,' Tripp says.

The problem stems from an abortion the couple had while they were engaged. 'I felt that the decision to terminate the pregnancy was forced upon me,' says Michelle. Tripp acknowledges his role in Michelle's unhappiness: 'When I made the decision to have the procedure, I think I lost a lot of her trust,' he says. Now, fear of failure keeps him from trying to have sex with his wife.

Tripp admits the only thing it could be is the abortion the couple went through. 'We weren't together very long when we had to deal with that,' Tripp says. 'And when it happened, it was like the sex went from 150 percent to zero. It was like the wall completely caved in on me.'

'The two of you got pregnant, the two of you went the route that you did, and don't both of you have to own that decision?' Dr. Phil asks the couple. He then addresses Tripp: 'Is it any wonder that you felt tremendous guilt and shame and pain over the decision and the pain it caused Michelle?'"

Go for it, Dr. Phil.

Unfortunately, he later tells them that what they must do is get over it and move it, without giving them any ideas about how to do that.

The last time they tried to have sex, as you can see from reading the transcript, Michelle ran from the room and cried for five hours. This is a situation that calls for more than the "okay, time to move on" advice.

This couple lost a child. They need to be allowed and encouraged to grieve together.

They also need to confess their sin to God, repent, and receive forgiveness and the grace to have a new life. "Moving on" without any of that is like wrapping a dirty rag around a shotgun wound to the gut and calling it good. The problem these people are facing is guilt. for. SIN. There is still only one remedy for sin: the blood of Christ.

Don't get me wrong. I think psychology and psychiatry have some invaluable tools and insights to offer. But like all other human arts and science, they cannot take the place of the Revelation and when they try to they reveal themselves as gimcrack dimestore idols. This "move on" crap is a lie and disservice to these suffering people who need real peace, not bromides about "owning your decision" and "moving on".



Censorship and Death

Just two of the services provided by the tender pastoral ministrations of the Dioceses of Rockville Center and Brooklyn.





As I feared...

Someday, somebody will make a film that really does justice to the enormously complex and fascinating figure of Martin Luther.

But not today.

I figured this would be a hack job when I saw the dewy Joseph Fiennes was cast as Luther and not somebody like a young Ernest Borgnine. This is cartoon history for the "Titanic" set.




This will stun you, I know, but...

The creator of the St. Sebastian's Angel's website for gay priests has stepped down from his ministry while being investigated for swimming nude with young male campers in the 1980's.

I know, I know. There's no connection whatever between immersion in gay culture and the abuse of boys, boys, boys, boys and boys. Still I thought people would be interested in this odd one-of-a-kind news story.

Roman Catholic Faithful , which persisted in trying to expose this nest of vipers to the light until it succeeded, continues to rack up points for prophetic heroism.